Implementation of ultraportable echocardiography in an adolescent sudden cardiac arrest screening program.

BACKGROUND: Over a 12-month period, adolescent heart-screening programs were performed for identifying at-risk adolescents for sudden cardiac death (SCD) in our community. Novel to our study, all adolescents received an abbreviated, ultraportable echocardiography (UPE). In this report, we describe the use of UPE in this screening program. METHODS AND RESULTS: Four hundred thirty-two adolescents underwent cardiac screening with medical history questionnaire, physical examination, 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), and an abbreviated transthoracic echocardiographic examination. There were 11 abnormalities identified with uncertain/varying clinical risk significance. In this population, 75 adolescents had a murmur or high ECG voltage, of which only three had subsequent structural abnormalities on echocardiography that may pose risk. Conversely, UPE discovered four adolescents who had a cardiovascular structural abnormality that was not signaled by the 12-lead ECG, medical history questionnaire, and/or physical examination. CONCLUSIONS: The utilization of ultraportable, handheld echocardiography is feasible in large-scale adolescent cardiovascular screening programs. UPE appears to be useful for finding additional structural abnormalities and for risk-stratifying abnormalities of uncertain potential of adolescents' sudden death.

Development and validation of a predictive screening tool for uninterpretable coronary CT angiography results.

BACKGROUND: Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is an excellent tool for noninvasive assessment of coronary arteries in low- to intermediate-risk individuals. However, the accuracy of CCTA heavily depends on image quality. Our objective was to develop and validate a tool to predict pre-CCTA risk of obtaining an uninterpretable result in symptomatic patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Among 8585 symptomatic patients, we identified variables independently associated with the presence of at least 1 uninterpretable major coronary segment to create the uninterpretable risk score (URS). This risk score was developed using both clinical variables and patient variables acquired at the time the CCTA was performed (heart rate and coronary calcium). The URS was then prospectively validated among an additional 915 symptomatic patients. The URS was predictive of uninterpretable results in both the development and the validation cohorts. For every 4-point increase in the URS (range, 0 to 12), the rate of at least 1 uninterpretable coronary segment per 100 CCTA studies increased ≈1.5 fold. Increased heart rate and coronary artery calcium score were predictive of uninterpretable CCTA study results. Uninterpretable results were associated with 3-month outcomes in the development cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The URS can categorize patients who are likely to have at least 1 uninterpretable major coronary segment on CCTA. This may aid in appropriate patient selection for CCTA and avoiding radiation exposure in those likely to have an uninterpretable study. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: http:///www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00640068.

Measuring service learning outcomes: test-retest reliability of four scales.

Previous research efforts have developed and validated various scales potentially useful in evaluating service learning outcomes. The developmental efforts reported for the four scales examined in this study did not include the test-retest reliabilities that would provide assurance to service learning researchers of the long-term stability and therefore usefulness of these measures. Summary estimates of 13-wk. test-retest reliabilities for the scales Civic Participation, Self-efficacy Toward Service, Attitude Toward Helping Others, and College Education's Role in Addressing Social Issues provide service learning researchers with evidence of stability of the scales over the typical duration of service learning courses.

Measuring students' attitudes toward college education's role in addressing social issues.

As service-learning projects have spread throughout academia, efforts to assess the service-learning experience have assumed a greater importance. The BERSI scale (Business Education's Role in addressing Social Issues) was developed as a measure of business students' attitudes toward social issues being addressed as part of a business education. As such, it was intended to be useful in assessing attitudinal outcomes of service learning. In order for the BERSI to be useful for nonbusiness students, the scale would need to be reconceptualized and revalidated. This study modified the BERSI items with a focus on college students in general rather than business students, making the resulting scale, College Education's Role in addressing Social Issues (CERSI), potentially helpful to service-learning researchers in a broader setting. The CERSI scale was then validated using standard techniques and normative data were reported.

A randomized controlled trial of an emergency department-based interactive computer program to prevent alcohol misuse among injured adolescents.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether an emergency department (ED)-based laptop computer intervention reduces the normative age-related increase in alcohol misuse compared with standard of care. METHODS: This was a randomized controlled trial conducted from October 11, 1999, to April 14, 2001, in a community teaching hospital and university medical center. Subjects were aged 14 to 18 years and with a minor injury. Controls and intervention participants completed a computer-based questionnaire. Intervention participants also completed a laptop-based interactive computer program to affect alcohol misuse. Main outcome measures were Alcohol Misuse Index (Amidx) and binge-drinking episodes. Follow-up occurred by telephone at 3 and 12 months. Analysis included repeated-measures analysis of variance (alpha=0.05; power 0.80; effect size 0.10). RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-nine participants were randomized to the intervention group, and 326 participants were randomized to the control group. Two hundred ninety-five (89.7%) intervention subjects and 285 (87.4%) control subjects completed 3- and 12-month follow-ups. For intervention and control groups, respectively, mean age was 16.0 and 15.9 years and men composed 66.8% and 66.3% of the groups; Amidx scores were 2.2 and 2.0; binge-drinking episodes were 1.2 and 1.0. Outcomes for intervention and control, respectively, were Amidx (3 months) 1.5 and 1.4; Amidx (12 months) 1.8 and 2.1; binge drinking (3 months) 0.9 and 0.8; and binge drinking (12 months) 1.4 and 1.2. Overall, there were no significant effects (effect size 0.04). No detrimental effects were noted. Subgroup analysis suggested that the intervention may have an effect among subjects with experience drinking and driving (5% of the sample). CONCLUSION: The intervention was not effective in decreasing alcohol misuse among the study population. Further research will be required to determine effectiveness among the subgroup of adolescent minor injury patients who have experience drinking and driving.

Feasibility of using an interactive laptop program in the emergency department to prevent alcohol misuse among adolescents.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Alcohol, the most commonly used substance among adolescents, is frequently associated with injury. Effective interventions to prevent adolescent alcohol use and misuse in acute care settings are lacking. A laptop-based alcohol prevention program could reinforce other prevention efforts that adolescents may receive. We determined the feasibility of using an interactive laptop program with adolescent emergency department (ED) patients to prevent alcohol use and misuse. METHODS: We used the recruitment phase of a randomized controlled trial at an academic medical center and an urban teaching hospital. Patients were aged 14 to 18 years and presented within 24 hours of an acute injury. Measures included patient recruitment, mechanism of injury, injury severity score, alcohol use characteristics, and patients' opinion of the computer program. RESULTS: Of 843 eligible patients, 671 (79.6%) were enrolled and 655 (77.7%) completed the program. Parent or guardian reluctance was the most frequent reason for refusal. The participants averaged 16.0 years of age (range 14 to 18 years; SD 1.5 years), 66.9% were male, and 68.3% were white. Approximately 71% reported "ever" drinking. Recent alcohol use (past 3 months) by those "ever" drinking was as follows: 62.3% drank, 31.2% got drunk, and 37.4% binge drank. Seventy-four percent of recent drinkers reported that the program made them rethink their alcohol use. Ninety-four percent of participants liked the program. Only 5.3% required assistance with the program. CONCLUSION: Use of an interactive computer program in the ED appears feasible. Further work is being done to evaluate the effectiveness of the program in reducing alcohol-related behaviors among adolescents.

Violence and substance use among an injured emergency department population.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated a sample of emergency department (ED) patients for history of violence and substance abuse. METHODS: Injured patients (n = 320) completed questionnaires (14% refusal rate) during a visit to a Level 1 urban ED after an acute injury. Specific questions were asked regarding whether the injury was related to acute violence (AV), whether there was past-year violence history (VH), including violence victimization and perpetration in both partner and nonpartner relationships, as well as any substance use in the past month and any substance-related consequences in the past year. RESULTS: Fourteen percent of the participants presented with an AV-related injury, and 53% reported VH. Most AV patients (89%) reported VH. No significant differences were found between the participants with AV and VH in demographic, substance use, or substance-related consequences. The AV and VH groups were combined (V), with analyses comparing these participants with those without AV and VH. Men were significantly more likely than women to report V (odds ratio = 2.0). V was significantly related to substance use and substance-related consequences. For example, in comparison with the participants reporting no alcohol or drug use, those reporting illicit drug use were 6.2 times as likely to report V, and those drinking any alcohol only were 2.0 times as likely to report V. CONCLUSIONS: A large percentage of injured patients in this urban ED experienced violence in the past year. Alcohol and illicit drugs appear to be concomitant with violence.